2011 World Series Outlook

COACHING:

STL - Tony La Russa, Dave Duncan, Mark McGwire

TEX- Ron Washington, Mike Maddux, Scott Coolbaugh

La Russa has been pushing the right buttons all season long.  People forget St. Louis hasn't had their ace right-hander Adam Wainwright too.  What he and his coaching staff have done throughout this postseason is truly magical.

Advantage: St. Louis Cardinals

STARTING PITCHING:

STL - Chris Carpenter, Edwin Jackson, Kyle Loshe, Jaime Garcia

TEX - C.J. Wilson, Derek Holland, Colby Lewis, Matt Harrison














Poor starting pitching from Texas has been survived by the best offense in baseball.  The Cardinals have been without the aforementioned Wainwright but the leader of their staff, Chris Carpenter has been tough as nails.  The Rangers rely on their bullpen, while the Cardinals try to get goose eggs any way they can.  Pujols and Holliday will be anxious to hit against the Rangers lefty dominant staff.  I like the Cardinals' front men over the struggling Rangers rotation.

Advantage: St. Louis Cardinals

BULLPEN:

STL - Jason Motte, Fernando Salas, Octavio Dotel, Arthur Rhodes

TEX - Neftali Feliz, Alexi Ogando, Mike Adams, Darren Oliver

Texas has the best bullpen in baseball.  Mike Adams, statistically the best reliever over the past few years doesn't even take the mound unless the game goes to extra innings.  Feliz and Ogando are untouchable with some of the most electric stuff in the game.  St. Louis has a makeshift bullpen that doesn't come close to matching up with their counterparts.

Advantage: Texas Rangers

OFFENSE:

STL - Rafael Furcal, Allen Craig, Jon Jay, Albert Pujols, Lance Berkman, Matt Holliday, David Freese, Yadier Molina

TEX - Ian Kinsler, Elvis Andrus, Josh Hamilton, Michael Young, Adrian Beltre, Mike Napoli, Nelson Cruz, David Murphy

Both teams have strong bats in the middle of the order.  Texas' depth from one to nine though is hard to beat.  This series is definitely loaded with offense and should make for some exciting baseball.

Advantage: Texas Rangers

DEFENSE: Push

FINAL PREDICTION - WINNER & MVP:

Texas can out-slug any team in baseball with their power and depth.  Not to mention, they play 7 innings, rather than the conventional 9 because they have two dominant power arms lurking in the bullpen. If Texas has a lead and they can get the ball to Ogando and Feliz for the 8th and 9th, it's over folks.  Texas' only weakness this postseason has been their starting pitching, specifically their ace, C.J. Wilson.  I think Texas is the overall better team playing with some added motivation after last year's World Series loss to San Francisco.  If they can win on the road and get some quality innings from their starting rotation this series could be over quickly.

St. Louis has been playing elimination games since September and have definitely proven their worth.  They've had to go through it all, facing dominant pitching in the Phillies and dealing with a high-powered offense in the Brewers.  St. Louis is surely the underdog but are definitely no slouch.  They have a potent offense of their own with Pujols, Holliday, Berkman, and Freese in the middle.  The Cardinals also have ol' Mo and the all important home field advantage on their side.  They are playing with a chip on their shoulder going into what is going to be an exciting World Series.

When it's all said it done, I don't think St. Louis will have a "happy flight;" they won't need a flight.  They'll win Game 6 at home in Busch Stadium with Joe Buck making the proud call for his hometown redbirds.

"It's not about the best players, it's about the right ones."

2011 WORLD SERIES CHAMPION: 

St. Louis Cardinals

1 STL, 2 TEX, 3 STL, 4 STL, 5 TEX, 6 STL

 

MVP: Albert Pujols

Kill the Death Penalty

"Kill, kill, kill."  Turns out, the NFL and capital punishment have a similar war-cry.

In the NFL, teams frequently use the term "kill, kill, kill" to audible different plays on the field as a means of strategy.  In the U.S. government, however, "kill, kill, kill" has been the bread-and-butter play call 1,268 times, every single time resulting in a "perfect" execution.

The Sept. 21 execution of Troy Davis has sparked all kinds of controversy, most of them questions concerning whether Davis was guilty and deserving of receiving the death penalty.  The fact that the man is now dead and there were prior questions regarding his guilt immediately grabbed my attention.

I did some general research on the death penalty itself and came across some alarming facts, mostly all of them opposing the death penalty, much like myself.

The society we live in today is surrounded by death; whether it be from cancer, suicide, heart failure, murder, natural causes, or serving our hypocritical country, death is everywhere.  And what better way to "kill" this enormity of death than to continue with the use of capital punishment.

There are various issues with capital punishment, to say the least.  All of them, to me, are complete BS and give no legitimate reason to why the death penalty is installed in our legal system.

The first issue, to me, is baffling.  With the economic crisis we are struggling with, it would seem to me our government would be, let's say, economically sensitive.  According to the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, "the cost from start to finish in a single death penalty case can be as high as $7 million, while it's only estimated to be around $500,000 in cases resulting in life imprisonment."

More importantly, "the millions of dollars spent on capital punishment cuts into resources for other community interests, such as schools, hospitals, public safety, and jobs."  Well, it doesn't surprise me that tax dollars are feeding our bloodthirsty bodies rather than building better schools or funding medical care.

The next issue addresses the notion that capital punishment restores social order and peace of mind within the community.  Well, according to the NCADP, "many countries are able to preserve social order and maintain public confidence without using the death penalty, such as Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Poland, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. Also, these countries generally have lower murder rates than does the United States."

In addition, "many American states do not have the death penalty, including Alaska, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.  Also these states generally have lower murder rates than do states with the death penalty."  Out of all those countries listed it would seem that us Americans, us proud, honorable, brave Americans would take a stand to end capital punishment.

Thirdly, like the case with Troy Davis, are these people truly guilty?  And even if they are guilty, are they receiving a fair sentence?  Kathleen Parker of the Washington Post seems to believe that the government is a little quick to pull the plug.  "Our barbaric practice of capital punishment, premeditated and coldblooded, is, since we're in a biblical mood, an abomination. That we grant the state the power to end a citizen's life is a harrowing-enough thought. That we do so even when we know with certainty that sometimes innocents are killed is beyond comprehension."  The NCADP adds that, "at least 138 people have been exonerated from death row since 1973, including 23 from Florida alone."  So much for "life," liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

With all of these oppositions to the death penalty, it must be noted that losing a family member or friend is not something to be overlooked.  Our innate human response to death is anger, frustration, and sadness.  However, as difficult as it may seem, there has to be a better alternative.  The instant gratification or release of pain by avenging the death of a loved one is temporary.  The want to take someone's life, even if proven guilty, is everlasting and ongoing.

As the late Mohandas Gandhi said, "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind." 

There is nothing positive that comes from capital punishment, unless you own a cemetery. Continual death undermines our existence on earth and our freedom to live out a positive life.  It is so hypocritical for our nation, a nation that believes in freedom, second chances, and happiness to continuously carry out the death penalty.  Yes, they're guilty, we get it, but put them in prison, don't put them in hell.  All we do by killing these people is add to our already aggressive and violent nature.

I understand that there are varying degrees of criminals in our world, and some crimes would, on paper, warrant someone to be killed. However, killing someone is unnatural, it's inhuman, and it's not our purpose, nor should it be.  Without life, there is nothing, plain and simple.

Death is, and never should be the answer, especially in regards to our very own species.

"Live, live, live."

Fullerton Cops on Paid Leave

Nothing says "punishment" like being rewarded with paid leave after beating a man to his death.

According to the Orange County Register, "two Fullerton police officers facing criminal charges for the beating death of a mentally ill homeless man will continue to collect their full paychecks while the city does its own internal investigation." 

Despite favoring the way Orange County district attorney Tony Rackauckas has handled the majority of this case, I believe these officers should not be receiving full pay and benefits throughout this investigation process.  I believe some sort of deduction or complete hold on their salaries should be in order, especially for the two most-involved officers, Manuel Ramos and Cpl. Jay Cicinelli.

The Los Angeles Times reports that, "Ramos, charged with second-degree murder and involuntary manslaughter, pleaded not guilty Monday (Sept. 26). He remains jailed and the judge declined to lower his $1-million bail. Cicinelli pleaded not guilty last week to charges of involuntary manslaughter and excessive use of force and was released on $25,000 bail."

While the case carries on, these men, along with four other officers on administrative leave are cashing in.  I just don't understand how these men, particularly the two charged officers, can continue to be paid when, "officer Manuel Ramos is charged with second-degree murder and involuntary manslaughter and if convicted, faces up to 15 years to life in prison.  Cicinelli is charged with involuntary manslaughter and use of excessive force. Those charges carry a maximum sentence of four years in prison,"  this according to Lisa Wilson, an Orange County lawyer.

According to the Los Angeles Times, "defense attorneys for the two Fullerton police officers charged in the death of Kelly Thomas on Monday, Sept. 26 described the homeless man as a violent and dangerous criminal who was combative with officers and provoked them to use force."

Well, I was not actually there, so I will never know every little detail.  That said, what I do know is that Kelly Thomas was 135-pounds, homeless by choice, mentally ill, and approached on suspicion of auto burglary.  And in my opinion, he was bullied, battered, and bruised when other measures - safer and more civilized measures - could have, and should have, been taken.

In regards to Thomas being 135-pounds; why does it take six police officers to subdue him?  Why, instead of handcuffing him and putting him a patrol car, was he tasered and beaten multiple times, eventually to his death five days later in the hospital?

In regards to Thomas being homeless; according to his father, Kelly was homeless by choice.  This may be a stretch, but leads me to believe that any business he had looking through car windows is harmless.

In regards to Thomas being mentally ill; even if he wasn't complying, why does it suddenly become a pride of lions preying on a lowly deer?  According to the Huffington Post, "Officer Manuel Ramos donned the gloves and made two fists in front of him (Thomas). Prosecutors say Ramos then said: 'Now see my fists? They are getting ready to F you up.'"

According to Ramos' lawyer, "it was an attempt by the officer to use words not force to get the suspect to do what he's supposed to do.  He sought to avoid physical confrontation with word and there was no compliance by Mr. Thomas."
Unfortunately for Ramos, Rackauckas didn't buy it. "This declaration was a turning point - a defining moment. We simply cannot accept that in our community it is within a police officer's right to place gloves on his hands, show his fists to a detainee and threaten that he will `eff' him up - that is not protecting and serving."
I could not agree more with Rackauckas.  However, I am still puzzled, and quite frankly irritated as to why these men have been getting paid throughout these investigations. Their duty as a police officer is on hold, why isn't their salary?

Fullerton police Sgt. Andrew Goodrich stated, "I realize that, to the public, that appears wrong, but we have to make sure that we are making lawful decisions when it comes to employment status."
According to the same article in the Orange County Register, "legal experts who have defended police officers in the past said Fullerton would likely face legal challenges if it fired the officers without doing its own investigation and showing that they were guilty of misconduct."
Unfortunately, perception is sometimes reality, and in this case these officers are being rewarded for their acts of brutal violence.  The last thing the Thomas family or anyone aware of this case wants is for these police officers to be rewarded for their crime, even in the slightest bit.

The only payment these men should be receiving should come from the public's tax dollars that give prisoners three meals a day.

10 Years Later - A Traumatized Nation

"Oh my, folks!  We could be witnessing the greatest upset in the history of the world! If you're just joining us, we're ringside in what has turned out to be a surprising, one-sided boxing match.  Bin Laden, out of the "dead" corner, is taking full control of the blue corner's, Sammy Stripes, and is on pace to end the fight with a knock-out blow!"

Ever since the tragic events on Sept. 11, 2001, American security measures have increased immensely.  With this increase, there has been a corresponding, and somewhat inevitable, rise of fear within Americans, including myself.

This fear has hindered my ability to remain calm in uncontrollable situations, specifically traveling on planes.  I can't travel on a plane without a pre-flight panic attack followed by a superstitious routine that includes contemplating whether or not I should pay attention to the safety briefing.

Once my palms begin to dry from the sweat, the plane begins to take off and my uneasiness subsides for a short while until the plane is off the ground.  Then, it's "say-your-prayers" time.  The fate of everyone on the plane is entrusted to the pilot, who, for all we know, could be an undercover terrorist and has a secret landing spot in the Pacific Ocean he'd like to show us.

After hours at the cruising altitude, the pilot finally asks the cabin to prepare for landing, and all I am thinking is, "listen man, you prepare for landing! Get this damn bird on the ground!"  As the plane closes in on touching down, fear of an unsuccessful landing settles in.  But as soon as the plane lands safely and that fasten seatbelt sign is turned off, it's as if I just came up for air after getting pummeled by a cascade of waves. 

Yeah, you could say I have a fear of flying, but what American doesn't?  Don't you think the attacks on Sept. 11, 2001 have anything to do with it?  You'd be lying if you said they didn't.

For me, this hysteria has gotten so bad I can't even go to the bathroom on a plane without thinking a bomb might be triggered by flushing the toilet, or, better yet, the flight attendants were paid off by hijackers who have machine guns.  I mean, the possibilities are endless, especially in today's world of technology, advanced knowledge, and continued conflict. 

Kathleen Parker, an opinion writer for The Washington Post , shares this idea by stating, "something was unleashed 10 years ago that bears our scrutiny. It wasn’t only evil, though the attacks were certainly that. The event was so cataclysmic and horrifying that it caused a sort of emotional breakdown in the American constitution. Simply put, it damaged our collective soul and seems to have released a free-ranging hysteria that has contaminated our interactions ever since."

But, let's be honest, we're screwed either way.  Osama bin Laden and his followers have successfully crippled the American people.  It's the whole "damned if you do, damned if you don't" philosophy.  If we take preventative measures, it's almost as if we have no peace of mind, always fearful of something disastrous to happen.  Then, if we don't prepare for a dangerous attack, well, I don't even want to go there.

My fear of flying is one thing, but is this fear one big slippery slope affecting our everyday lives?  Again, I'd be lying if it weren't the case.  According to Parker, "being for or against the war, first in Afghanistan and later in Iraq, divided us as wars do, but this time was different. Friendships ended, marriages suffered, people crossed the street to avoid those with whom they disagreed. Ten years later, we are still at war. Tack on the global financial crisis, stagnant unemployment, the further dissolution of trust in our institutions, and we have all the ingredients for moral panic.

To me, the tragic events on Sept. 11, 2001 have lingered in the hearts and minds of Americans, festering like a bacteria, plaguing our everyday lives.  It's almost as if Osama bin Laden's ultimate attack on Americans wasn't manifested through planes crashing into buildings so much as it was a virus of fear he implanted into the American people.

Looking back, I never thought that such a tragedy conspired by one man could be so detrimental to one nation.  Granted, bin Laden is no slouch, but we're talking about the United States of America, the biggest, baddest, SOB on the block!

"Gee Larry, I don't know how much more Stripes is going to be able to take!  We're 10 rounds into this fight and bin Laden has been in control all night."

"Yeah Jim, but all Stripes needs is one big punch to get back in this fight."

A Numbers Game - Or is it?

Often when sports enthusiasts talk about numbers it is mostly in terms of statistics.  Batting averages, completion percentages, field goal percentages, and so on.  Sure, statistics give some indication on production - or lack their of - of athletes and teams, but are they really that important?  Last I checked, America loves winners, and to me, the number one statistic isn't so much a number as it is a letter.  Yeah, W.  Now, don't mistake me for a win-at-all-cost guy, I believe that win or lose, there is nothing greater than the thrill of competition.  However, it seems as though in today's world of sports, the desire for W's comes after % and $.  That may seem a tad brash, and granted, I am not a professional athlete, therefore, most of my interpretation is, well, interpreted.  But, with that said, I think the art of competition is lost.  There's a reason athletes like Rafael Nadal, Tom Brady, Michael Vick, Ray Lewis, Kobe Bryant, Dwyane Wade, Dirk Nowitzki, Derrick Rose, and Jered Weaver are amongst my favorite athletes to watch. 

Why? 

It's pretty simple; they compete.
 

Football Weekend's Best

NCAA FOOTBALL

UPSET: Clemson takes down 21 Auburn to snap a 17-game winning streak.

TEAM UNIT: Les Miles' LSU Defense.

PLAYER: Marcus Lattimore, South Carolina. 37 carries for 246 yards and 3 TDs in a 24-21 W against a pesky Navy ballclub.

TEAM: Oklahoma Sooners.  A 23-13 W against 5 Florida State in Tallahassee showed the Sooners are for real.  Honorable Mentions should be made for LSU and Alabama.  I predict Oklahoma to meet the winner of LSU-Alabama for the BCS National Championship.

NFL

UPSET: It's the NFL, there really aren't any upsets.  But, the Tennessee Titans' thrashing of the visiting Baltimore Ravens caught some by surprise.  After looking unbeatable in a Week 1 against the rival Steelers, the Ravens were beat by the Titans 26-13.

TEAM UNIT: Detroit Lions Offense/Defense.  Stafford and company put up 48 points, while the defense forced 6 turnovers allowing only 3 points against the Chiefs.  Safe to say this was a complete W for the Lions as they move to 2-0 en route to a long-awaited playoff berth.

PLAYER: Really?

TEAM: Again, really?  It's that guy (up there) and his comrades in New England.  An honorable mention could be made for the defending champion Packers, but as long as Brady is healthy - look out.  As of now, look for these two teams to square off in February.

MV7

Michael Vick returns to the Georgia Dome this Sunday to face his old team, the Atlanta Falcons.  Vick returns this time in a new uniform with new expectations.  It should make for some entertaining football as it airs Sunday night on NBC as the prime-time game of the week.

The below article I wrote for my opinion writing class.  It addresses Vick's new contract with the Eagles and his continued path to redemption...

Talk about paying your dues.  $100 million for 6 years, $40 million of it guaranteed. 

That's the recent contract the ever-so polarizing quarterback Michael Vick signed with the Philadelphia Eagles.  With those millions of dollars, came millions of questions, specifically from those who hold the opinion that forgiving Michael Vick is premature. 

There are public opinions out there that that feel Vick's involvement in illegal dogfighting activitiies doesn't warrant him praise on the football field or as a role model.  On the contrary, there are those who believe that Michael Vick served his 21-month sentence and deserves a second chance.

I happen to support the latter.

Quite frankly, I am of the opinion that Michael Vick has been the brunt of criticism far too long.  I understand what he did was cruel, unethical, and unthinkable but it's unreasonable to condemn him for the rest of his life. Despite the magnitude of the crime, I feel he served a fair sentence and has become a better person throughout this entire process. 

Those who wish to see Vick fail are stubborn hypocrites, in my opinion.  Americans pride themselves on comeback stories and second chances.  Why is it any different for Michael Vick?  Are you so perfect and self-righteous that you have never made regrettable and poor decisions?

Michael Vick is one of my favorite athletes of all time, and when I look at Michael Vick, I look at who he is now.  I don't judge him on his past, I judge him on the present.  I believe Michael Vick has changed and nobody needs to tell him what he did was wrong; he knows.

According to him as reported by ESPN, "dogfighting is a terrible thing and I reject it. I take full responsibility for my actions.  Not for one second will I sit right here and point the finger and try to blame anybody else for my actions or what I've done.  I offer my deepest apologies to everybody out in there in the world who was affected by this whole situation. And if I'm more disappointed with myself than anything it's because of all the young people, young kids that I've let down, who look at Michael Vick as a role model. And to have to go through this and put myself in this situation, you know, I hope that every young kid out there in the world watching this interview right now who's been following the case will use me as an example to using better judgment and making better decisions."

And if actions speak louder than words, then I am of the opinion that what Michael Vick has done on the football field is his way of reconciling his sins and proving to not only the public, but to himself, that he is sincerely sorry for his criminal activity.  Vick's football talent and mere athleticism has always been evident, but in my opinion, there are few athletes, let alone people, that can rebound from such a low point in their life like Vick has.

Bruce Arthur (no relation) applauds just how special of an athlete Vick is by stating, "however you feel about the crimes of Michael Vick, what he has accomplished is remarkable. He spent 21 months in prison, lost just about everything he had, was released back into the world in the middle of the night, and has now indisputably returned to the pinnacle of professional football, or near enough."

You might argue that Vick was already a star player and his athletic abilities have never been in question, only his character.  Very true, but something tells me this dogfighting incident was the best thing that could have ever happened to Vick.  Call it a wake-up call, a reality check, call it what you wish, I feel that those years in Leavenworth really shaped who he is today not only as an elite NFL athlete, but as a humbled and grateful man.

"Once again, I offer my deepest apologies to everyone. And I will redeem myself. I have to." 

I believe in you Mike.

Kelly Thomas RIP

Dad! Help me Dad! Please Dad! Save me! Dad! Please!

All Kelly Thomas wanted was his dad.  Instead, he was beaten, and ultimately killed, allegedly at the hands of six Fullerton police officers.

On July 5 of this year, Kelly Thomas, a diagnosed schizophrenic and homeless man by choice was subdued by six Fullerton policemen on suspicion of an auto burglary.  According to the LA Times, "Thomas’ father, a retired Orange County sheriff’s deputy, has asserted that officers used excessive force to subdue his son, who was unarmed, slight and of medium height."  Mike Riggs specifies these remarks and states Thomas weighed 135 pounds.

Wait, so you mean to tell me it takes six police officers to subdue an unarmed 135-pound man?  What kind of fitness regiment are these people running over in Fullerton?  Six guys?  Really?

Okay, now on a more important note, why in the world would six officers need to taser a man several times to subdue him? Why would they need to beat him?  Six officers can’t hold a 135-pound man down, handcuff him, and place him in the back of a patrol car?

I guess not.

That, to me, and many others, is reprehensible.

After Thomas was publicly beaten he was placed at UCI Medical Center and put on life support.  "When I first walked into the hospital, I looked at what his mother described as my son ... I didn't recognize him.  This is cold-blooded, aggravated murder," said Thomas' father. 

I empathize with the entire Thomas family and can't even begin to fathom the amount of sadness, frustration, and rancor the entire family must be feeling.  The unfortunate incident has caused an uproar in the normally quiet north Orange County community of Fullerton.  Citizens are outraged; and rightly so.

Now, thanks to these six ruthless officers, police officers everywhere have to answer the skepticism. As with any profession, there are the good and the bad.  But now, officers in Fullerton and throught the country (since this story has received nationwide attention) will be the subjects of hatred and mistrust.

For me, I've always had my doubts and resentment towards police.  They're arrogant, power-hungry, and think their damn badge permits them to do whatever the hell they want.  However, I’m smart enough to realize that despite my own perception, there are good cops out there that serve their community honorably.  However, now, even the good ones are tainted, all thanks to six callous individuals.

And, let's just call a spade a spade.  No matter how you perceive what transpired, there is no way in hell that a self-defense plea is passable.

I'm all for safety and protecting yourself in life-threatening situations, but this incident was by no means life-threatening for any one of those six officers..  This was the "big-bad" seniors picking on the weak freshman who ate lunch by himself on the football bleachers.  This was an unwarranted beating that these men will have some time to think about; that is if they don't get the death penalty.

According to NBC, Thomas' father states, “What I want to see done is the primary guy that was beating my son in the back of the head with a taser, because this was indeed a hate crime.  I want him to get the death penalty and I’ll pull the switch.”

I don't know if the death penalty is the appropriate solution to this matter.  With that being said, I wouldn't want to be one of those six officers and run into Mr. Thomas.  Otherwise, like he said, he'd pull the switch himself.

My best regards go out to Thomas' family and friends.  May Kelly rest in peace.

Heart of a Champion

Over the course of my life, athletics has been constant.  I have always played and watched them as if they were apart of me.  Recently, I have pondered about athletes of my generation and have thought, first of all, how lucky I have been to watch great players like Tiger Woods, Wayne Gretzky, Cristiano Ronaldo, Roger Federer, Tom Brady, Kobe Bryant, Derek Jeter, the Williams sisters, Michael Phelps and countless other individuals who have made their mark in their respective sport.  Second of all, to go into more depth, what is that makes an athlete truly great?

A lot of people deem greatness by numbers, some by championships, others by an athlete's influence on the game.  For me, I judge greatness on heart.  Sure, talent plays a part in being successful, but as the late great John Wooden stated, "success comes from knowing that you did your best to become the best that you are capable of becoming."  So where does heart come into play?  Well, it's nurtured in the off-season and is different for each athlete I'm sure, but it is manifested in the closing seconds of a game, on the 18th green, in the final set at Wimbledon, in the World Series.  It happens on the game's biggest stage.

My grandfather always said, the cream will rise to the top.  You don't get to the top based soley on talent alone though, it takes heart.  Heart is what makes champions.  Heart is defined as wanting to win more than the other person and working harder than them to get there.  Heart is defined in the players I have listed above.  Sure, they are all great athletes and have talent, but they have maximized their talent through hard work and effort to become who they are now.  There's a reason people talk about the "heart of a champion" and not the talent of a champion or the influence of a champion.  It takes heart, miles and miles of heart, a la Jimmy McGinty, Shane Falco, and Chase Arthur.

The Great Debate

No, not Kobe or Lebron, not Red Sox or Yankees, not Democrat or Republican, but So Cal or Nor Cal.  The Southern California - Northern California rivalry has existed for quite some time, and luckily for me, I have been able to experience both sides of the coin.  The similarities exist, however they are almost considered differences because of the originality involved.  From what I have been able to grasp, they both possess unique and beautiful qualities about them that makes choosing one over the other a difficult task.

Let's start with home.  Southern California has been my home for 21 years, however 2 of them have been spent in Northern California.  It's hard not to like Southern California.  It boasts some of the best weather and location in the entire world.  After getting home the other day from school in Northern California, I was just in awe at how beautiful the area is.  I guess after 21 years I have finally come to appreciate all that exists in my backyard.  I mean people around the world consider Southern California a vacation destination, and for me, it's just home.

Aside from the weather and gorgeous homes, I think the variety of scenery in Southern California is under-appreciated.  The beach, the nature-filled canyons, the lakes, the isolated hilltops, and the mountains are all within reach.  Not to mention, as far as living, Southern California offers it all.  It offers homes practically anywhere just mentioned.  There sure is a lot of variety, and all of it at the top of its class. However, when it comes to people, Southern California receives some knocks.  I'm trying not to generalize, but from my experiences in Southern and Northern California the people in Northern California are far more approachable, courteous, and down to earth.

I have been in Northern California for 2 years, both during college.  At first, I hated the place.  It took some getting used to with everyone saying hella, dressing differently, and having a different attitude towards life.  Northern California people, from my experience, are genuine, very loyal, and passionate towards everything in their life, especially their sports' teams.  They may not boast the expensive houses like Newport Beach, but they don't give a damn about the car you drive compared to who you are as a person.  And don't get me wrong, Northern California has some beautiful areas to live like Saratoga, Los Gatos, Redwood City, San Mateo, Palo Alto and many others that might not get the attention like some of the Southern California homes.

I guess after writing this, they possess a lot of the same characteristics with their own wrinkle to them.  It's hard for me to describe, and I'm stuck.  I don't know who wins the debate, it is something you are going to have to experience for yourself.  I obviously have a bias towards Southern California since it is my home, but I also owe a lot of my growth and appreciation for life to Northern California.  I have gained so much perspective from Northern California and its such a refreshing place, but home is home and it's hard to compete against a place like Southern California.  Sorry to disappoint, but I'm not picking a winner, I cherish both, and attribute who I am to both places.  Both of them are a great place to live, making it a tough decision on where I want to live in the future.  However, something tells me I'll want to stay down here at home.  Until then though, I'm not ruling out any ideas of heading North again and settling up there.